Lack of Defense

So I figured Alex might show and I would get to play him and sure enough I was right. I am 0-3 against him going into this game, and so there was at least a goal to shoot for.

I did get there 9 minutes late, so only had 76 minutes, and did get into time-pressure, but I don’t think that’s the issue. People play G/30 and G/60 and still don’t make the mistake that I did. I use around 75% of my time on offense and saved 25% (that you never know you will need but always do) for defense. This should be the opposite.

I figured that my position should be better, and that I should switch to defense, but I never quite did except when it was forced. I sacked a knight trying to gain a perpetual, but should have switched over to solid defense. I haven’t looked at this with an engine yet because I am on my Linux machine and an engine isn’t installed into Xboard yet.

It’s easy to say there is more a feeling of certainty with offense than there is with defense, but this is no excuse, my gut told me I needed to try and defend and see what happens, but I got lazy and tried to sac my way out of it into a draw.

If I played this game again, I would definitely improve. I didn’t tell Alex, (we both knew that Qh3 didn’t work out so well), but in the future I would try a Rd1, and I knew that I should play that move going into it, but I got too undisciplined and wanted to attack prematurely. This is my chess problem right now, attacking prematurely, spending too much time on attack, not saving time for defense, and not being willing to try and defend and just see where that leads.

I am just looking at this right now and thinking about how I decided not to play 29.Qh5 during the game because I was low on time and unsure about “wasting” a tempo. I can’t believe I decided to sac instead but I thought he could defend with …Rc7 not even noticing that that would drop the d-pawn. So, perhaps I really did have a win there after all. I was also unsure about the 29…f6 reply after 29.Qh5.

Maybe this is better not dumbing myself down with computer analysis. 29.Qh5! f6, 30. exf Rxf?, 31.Ng5 RxR, 32. QxR looks winning. So 30…gxf, 31.Rxe6 and it’s going to be interesting to see Black try and defend this and push the a and b pawns. It didn’t even take me much time sitting here to find this, just a few minutes that I did not have at the time.

Oh shoot, I just worked it out in another four minutes about. I was also worried about 29.Qh5! d3, 30.Ng5 h6, 31.Nxf7 RxR, 32.Nxh6+ gxN, 33.Qg6+ Kh8, 34.RxRf8 mate. Last possible variation to look at, in my mind, is 32…RxNf7, 33.QxR+ Kh7, 34.RxR QxR and I have a rook for three pawns. All I have to do then is win one pawn with queen, trade queens and rook can stop the other two pawns. I don’t know how accurate this was up against Crafty, but I can say that I could have done it easily in 10 minutes, if I had had 10 more minutes at that point. I was definitely the fresher person after the game. I wasn’t tired, just didn’t save time for all the turd complications thrown at me.

Also, 32..Kh7, 33.Ng5+ Kg8, 34.RxR+ KxR, 35.Qf7 mate. Now let Crafty find a hole, I think I covered that rather well.

My previous computer died. I rebuilt a Windows machine but just lost a long reply to this. This site is much more jacked-up on this machine, but I also use an Ubuntu machine which is better. Wow, this is virtually unusable, but I wanted to comment that both move 29. lines are equal 0.00 draw in theory. 29.Qh5 h6, 30. g5 g6 (I had seen this idea but not in this line), 31.Qg5 Kh7, 32.Qe3.

I’m thinking that if I had played 29.Qh5, he probably plays ..d3 and loses, instead of ..h6 which would at least win on time. I should have given him one more chance to lose and remained hopeful. Just checked, there was one more flaw in my post-game analysis of 29.Qh5, I forgot that there is no Rf8 mate because his queen is covering f8, so if he had replied ..d3, the game ends in perpetual check instead (Qg6+, Qh6+), but at least that really would have been the quickest chance to come up with a draw. But if I had had an hour left, I would play 29.g5 and he has a lot of chances to make a mistake still – my gut tells me he would make a mistake eventually and lose.

He had maybe 57 minutes left. It’s not that I am playing especially slow so much as these are G/30 veterans and they play fast. I figure 85 minutes vs. 76 minutes to start, plus spent time, so the entire game was played in about an hour and a half. I could have saved more time, but that is still on the fast-side for a game that lasted for virtually 40 moves. We had time to post-mortem our game, twice, plus post-mortem another guy’s game, and get out of there on time.

One other thing I learned about this game is that I can’t expect that a lower-rated players’ ideas won’t be better than mine, the ideas can and they will be better from time to time, but I need to win the battle of execution instead, not have so much pride and get overly stuck on defending ideas since that takes too much of a toll on the clock.


5 thoughts on “Lack of Defense

  1. That’s unfortunate Black had Bxf2+. White really must play Bd3 in these structures to stay active. The d4 pawn is never hanging because bishop plays check (b5 or h7) with discovered attack. Thanks for posting.

  2. Katar, thanks for posting. πŸ™‚

    No, Bd3 is not necessary, I like Be2 even better, but yes I looked at the Bxh7+ a few times.

    Here’s the thing, White plays a Rd1(!!) and Black is biting on granite, Black’s only idea is busted. Then White basically has his/her way with Black. But I got impatient and missed his Bxf2+ idea, yes! I was hoping that he would take the Ra1 instead of play …Rc2, but he showed poise and refrained from taking the rook in order to put me on the defensive.

    In the future, I will have to assume that my opponents will play good chess all game long and save time for that. In past games, he always dropped a piece, but he is past that stage of doing such a thing early in the game now. I gave him a book on tactics and Karpov’s best games, so I half expected to see some improved play. πŸ˜‰

    I looked again, you are right about Bd3 Katar, although I guess the idea is to play Bd3, just not all in one go. White only gets an equal position out of the opening.

    BTW, QxRa1 was winning, and Katar is right that Black is up after Bxf2+, but he didn’t follow up his attack in the best way.

    I’m thinking of throwing him a curve-ball next time and playing a KIA. He will probably think it has no fangs and play fast, and I can learn a new system, and hopefully become more patient by using a closed system.

  3. Your troubles started from 16. Qh3. Your position was rock solid, so I don’t understand why you played this move.
    His Rc2 was a big mistake, I would never ever not take on a1, his attack is worth nothing.
    Fritz says you had 0.8 advantage after 24. Qf4. Also it plays g6 after your 29. Qh5 and it’s about equal.
    I think you see yourself what happened – you were not patient and careful and spent too much time on attack, not leaving enough for defense.
    In this game after 15 moves I would simply put one rook on “c” line, neutralizing any counter-play and then play f4. Funny that as soon as I played Rc1 Fritz played Bg5 and f4. Then in that position, though equal by Fritz, I think you definitely could overplay him.

  4. 29.Qh5 g6, 30.Qh6 f5, 31.Ng5 Qe7 (forced), 32. gxf Rxf, 33.RxR exR, 33.Rh4 and now ..R2+, 35.Kf1 repetition is forced, as 33…Qc7 actually loses for Black. Black had a couple ways to go wrong there. I went over this with Crafty, but found some of those moves myself.

    The Qh3 idea was to be followed up with Bd3, weakening his castled position. I figured he would capture on d4, but was only expecting Qe4 after I played Nf3 forking queen and bishop. Then my plan was to put rooks on e1 and d1, kicking out his queen and winning time and tactical resources. His ..Bxf2+, I never figured on that or saw it.

    I thought of 24.Qf4 but didn’t want to oppose his f-file rook with queen.

    The position was truly equal before I played Ng5, and I was still debating between Nxf7 plan and Qh5 plan, but low time made me want to pick the crazier choice, kind of like over-compensating for the problem. If I had only calculated that 29.Qh5 works against …d3, I would have played it.

    One thing which doesn’t get mentioned is that these faster players like Alex and Isaac, they do most of their thinking and best thinking on my time, so it’s actually not so advantageous for me to spend too much time against them. On the one hand, I usually play the move I would have blitzed, but OTH they spend the time and make a better move than if I had not given them time to think.

    But there is still some psychology involved, for example if I spend a lot of time giving up the exchange, Alex is more prone to believing it, that I had worked it through. Whereas, if Alex make a fast move, I am more prone to believe that he is confident in his decision. It’s odd, but true, often people have that “mind-read” feeling about their opponents’ moves OTB.

    Parting shot, I found 29.Qh5, Fritz won’t find that for you, Crafty is the same way “If it’s not Scottish, it must be crap! says the engine.” (old S&L skit) I kid, since I am part Scottish as well. You can mark my words, an engine won’t show you how to bail out of a position quickly, if it’s not forced to where that that’s the best thing to do, then the computer will tend to disdain it and look for longer play with more complications, but it’s something one needs to know how to do at G/90.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s