The Let-Down

Round 2

I was upset for losing this game because it was so won.  I anticipated correctly Paul’s premature attacking style, and figured I was winning after his quick 13…Qh3??, but still took the most time on this move, probably got too involved with it actually.  After a while during the game I noticed, and showed right away in the post-mortem that 17.Rxf3 Rad8, 18.Nd4 is easily winning, but then decided to see if 17.Nxf3 “looked more positional” and so I looked at it, and it seemed like a more sure way to trade down pieces, by attacking the queen of course.  I get mesmerized by queens, a very bad tendency of mine.

19.h3?? This was the move that attracted me to this line, but it’s certainly not thematic as placing either knight on e4, once again, is completely winning and covers g3 to boot!  However, I missed that I was giving up …Rxg3+, and without this resource White is still winning in all lines.  Nevertheless, the object of the game is checkmate and one cannot miss such a check – it’s a big eval changer, and it’s a decisive error.  Another thing to note is that even though 15.cxb7+ was the best move, if I hadn’t of played it in the h3 line I was still winning because I could have then taken the knight on g4 with check after his ….RxBe3 move, and hence traded queens at the same time.

I decided that 20.QxNg4 was best in the post-mortem, but it was still easily winning for Black  I determined after a few moves (it is the best, but still -8.88 after retreating Nf3 in a couple moves as the trading g-pawn for f-pawn loses quickly, as does trying to protect the g-pawn ).

I missed 22…Qh4, and then saw as as I was taking my hand off the piece that 23…Rh3+ was possible and would mate, and so as soon as he played it I resigned.

There’s just this bit of rust from my not playing regularly that decided this game.  I had this unsure feeling about 19.h3??, but just didn’t see the issue until he made his move.  I was too cavalier about the situation and made this move rather quickly.  It’s more pathetic than it  is sad that as a chessplayer, you really have to play a lot to keep from throwing away a position with a single move – it seems to have less to do with skill than it has to do with being warmed up.  Yesterday, I played a couple of blitz games at the club after the meeing and noticed this happening to me, total blunders such as this one, from easy superior positions.

This game looks like childs-play in hindsight.  How was it even possible to not win this game as White?  I pretty much had to blunder exactly as I did to not win this game.  I can’t afford to have a single tactical hole like this in my game, because it just goes to show I could have lost to anybody by making such a blunder.  This was one of those games you just want to throw away, as a game, but the analysis is still interesting because it was such an exciting middle-game setup.




2 thoughts on “The Let-Down

  1. 16. f4 was better than f3, because Black has to play exf3 and you can take on f3 with the rook protecting g3 pawn. After 16. f3 he could play 16… Nxe3 17. Qxe3 Bxg3 18. Qe2 Bxh2+ 19. Qxh2 Qxh2+ 20.Rxd2+ and in the end White has only +1 advantage.
    19. Nge4 instead of h3 was keeping the advantage.
    Yeah, it really was a sad loss.

  2. I didn’t notice that until Stockfish took a look at it. I could only see him playing that on a really good day, as you’d have to admit that you had trashed it previously to want to make up for it and go into that line – I’m guessing he had no desire to do that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s