Back On Track

Round 4 – final round of Wednesdays

Tough game, but an interesting and exciting one as well.

My rating for this month finished at 1839!  Back above 1800 yet again.  Man what an ordeal and journey just to get back over 1800.  Wednesdays have proven more fruitful for my rating than Tuesdays where Paul continually poaches off my rating in positions seemingly destined for a draw.  I had some interesting wins against low-rateds on Tuesdays, but they were worth a handful of rating points combined.

Coming into this month, I felt that I would gain a lot of rating points back.  In fact, I finished up 72 rating points from the beginning of the month, but didn’t realize just how many Class A players that I would face to get there.  Out of 9 rounds, I faced 1 Expert, 6 Class A, 1 Class C, and 1 Class D payer.

The French Defense has her ways

Round 3

6…cxd4  Perhaps it’s telling that the #1 move in the DB is 6…c4, by almost 2 to 1.

7….Be7  This move has a 23% success rate.  I even saw him about to move and just assumed it was going to be 7….Ne7, mistakenly wrote that down, and was pleasantly surprised when I looked up at the board.

8….f6?!  I feel it a compliment that after the game, he pointed to this move as not so good, to think a mistake could be made so early in the game.  Let me digress about this Alex, I haven’t played him in a long-time, and he has old-world charm, in suit and tie, a throwback.  I often think he’d fit in with the past masters of the 19th century.  8…f6 is playable, but he needs to take on e5, and then play …Nf6.

11.Na4  11.exf6 Nf6, 12.Bf4 is much stronger.  I thought about play exf6 on each move, but I was not wanting to waste time yet in an elusive hunt for the best move, since that is best done at home, as I’m doing right now.

12.Bf4  Houdini says 12.Be3 is more accurate.  I get lucky in this game, as my opponent played what I wanted him to play 12…f5, rather than …g5.  I got away with one here, but I shouldn’t try to do that so much.  Even after ….g5, Be3 is best by Houdini and Stockfish.

16…Qb6.  I felt this was risky, though understandable that he was looking for complications.  I saw his coming attack, rather quickly, and felt he should be playing 16…Nge7 instead, working on completing development.

17.b5  Not the best move.  Right here, I thought that I should continue to develop my position, but wasn’t confident precisely how I should do it, so I got loose and headed for the complications too soon, exactly what I was trying not to do, but lacked the impulse control not to.  17.Bd2, a move I had definitely considered, is much better, as is 17.Qa1 with idea of Rb1 and pawn pushes at the right time.  I was trying to keep it positional and not go into tactical too soon, but oh well, it’s even a big part of my style at this point.

17…Nxd4.  This is what I wanted him to do, or else I would not have spent so long on this move.  I felt his best was 17…axb5, 18.Bb5 Nge7, 19.Bg5, but even here White is close to +2.  He was right, in this line, not to take on b5 first, else after Bxb5 my queen will be able to recapture on d4.

18….Qxc5, best, but still +1.8 for White.  I had missed this obvious capture when analyzing, looking only at 18…NxNf3, 19.Qxf3, but I felt confident that the move played in the game should still be losing for him.  Notice that psychologically I am much more comfortable here, with Black attacking with his only developed pieces, rather than both sides cooly completing development.

21.Qe2  I was jumping to play 21.Qb1, and certainly would have done so in a blitz game without a thought, but wasn’t finding the right line OTB.  21.Qb1 Ka8, 22.Qb6(I was planning on playing) Rb8, 23.Qc7 (threatening 24.Nc6!) Rb7, 24.Qd8+ is the move I missed, but noticed it instantly once I got to this position with Houdini Rb8, 25.QxBd7.  If 23…Ne7, then 24.Nc2 threatens Black’s queen and mate on a7.

24.Nd4??  In time-pressure, I was getting a case of nerves, thinking it wasn’t hurting to repeat, but here 24….Qa4 would be +=, whereas he quickly repeated, instantly in fact 24….Qa3??  I was looking at 24.Ra1 Qb2, 25.Bb7+ KxB, 26.Qa6+ Kc7 (and now looking at 27.Qa7+, when I should be trying to get the Ra1 onto this square with check), 27.Qd6+ Kb7, 28.Ra7+! Kc8, 29.Qc7 mate.

29.Rb1  29.Rc1+ is an easy winner, but I missed this being in time-pressure, under 5 minutes.

33….Rd8.  I knew it was over when I saw this move, not even trying to create counter-play with 33…Rb1+.

My live rating is approx. 1822 after this game (but perhaps a few points lower than that).  This is nothing permanent of course, as my result in the last round could drop this by as much as 60 points with the tournament performance boost up or down in effect.

A Positional Test

….that’s what I always think of when playing Black against the Catalan.  The Catalan is a bold attempt by White to try to win on technique, and the better technical player stands a fair chance of winning.

Round 4

5…0-0  If you wait this long without taking on c4, then they call anything after this the Closed Catalan.  It’s safer, as Black, to wait before making any captures, although there are many sharp ways for Black to play the Catalan.

7.Nbd2  If 7.Na3, then 7…BxNa3!, with the idea of keeping the extra pawn for as long as possible, is strongest and equal.

7…c5  I chickened out here, and knew this move was sorta weak after I played it.  7…b5! where 8.Ne5 can be met by 8…Nd5, and Black already has a slight edge.

10…h6  Played after a record 40 minute think!  I afforded myself this luxury as I was strangely half an hour up on the clock at this point.  10…Qe7 is the only move in the DB, played nine times.  I considered playing 10…Qe7, but thought 11.Bg5 would be annoying, but Black can equalize in that case with 11…e5.

I wanted to play 10…Nd4, but this fails to 11.NxN QxN, 12.Be3 winning the bishop, so I wanted to play 10…b6 to defend the Bc5, but this is a little ridiculous once you realize that White is basically going to play 11.Rfd1 to stop this anyway.  I went so far as to calculate 10…b6, 11.Ne5 (11.Rfd1 is an exchange sac, around +.6 according to Houdini)…Nd4, 12.Qd3 Nd5, but now 13.e3 and 13.Be3 are both +1 for White, which I didn’t know, but there was an awful lot to have to be sure of, so I eventually called it off.

12.Bf4  Houdini likes 12.Be3 e5!? +.3 as best.  I was more worried about 12.Nce5, but failed to see that after 12…NxN, 13.NxN Bxf2+, 14.Kxf2 Qc5+ comes 14…Qc5xNe5 (this capture part I missed) – my guess is that he saw it.

13…f6?!  This move is a little ridiculous at face value.  I play 13…f6 to control e5, because I don’t want to get attacked, but this Be5 is doing nothing and is practically stopping his attack, so why push it away and create weaknesses when I haven’t even finished development?  Of course, I had some wild-eyed ideas of playing …Be6, but it took me a while to realize that wasn’t feasible.

15…Rb8?  I also considered 15…Rd8, but not until after I moved did I realize that I had just dropped my e6 pawn.  Luckily, he didn’t see it, so I hurriedly played …Rd8 on my next move.

16….Rd8 (…Kh8 was an alternative).  After playing this move, I realized to my horror, upon his long reflection, that I had missed 17.Nc6?? Luckily, we both saw that this would only get his queen trapped.

17.Nf5.  Never saw this, and my initial reaction was to take it, but I saw the line where I could drop a piece 17…exNf5, 18.Bxd5+ Be6?? (…Kh8), 19.Ne3! and now the Bc5 will drop.  I have to credit the times I’ve practiced tactics on chesstempo to be able to recognize and calculate this.  Funny, it turns out that the tactics ability helps on defense, spotting and side-stepping my opponent’s tactics, more than offensively, since I never had such a position of my own to attack from.

18.Nf5e3, calling off the hounds.  18.Nc4-d6! will win the e6 pawn again after the 18…BxNd6, 19.BxNd5! intermezzo.  I felt that when I played 17…Qf8, that I was creating a “chesstempo” position for him, but I never saw the shot OTB, so after spending time decided to play it.

19….BxNe3  Apparently 19…RxRd1, 20.RxR c5 was best, but at this point I realized that it was time to try and draw the game.

26…Qe8  Somehow, I missed 26…Qd6 (because I was looking to play this), and I even wanted to play the better 26…Qd8, but was feeling that time-pressure panic set it.  We were both down to two minutes, and Mark accepted my draw proposal once he went under a minute, but it’s not to late to mess this up and lose for Black.

In the quick post-mortem (Alex was driving and wanted to go), we looked at 27.Bd5 Rc8, 28.Rc7 RxR, 29.QxR Qc8?, 30.Qxb6 (I had missed that after 30…Bh3, simply 31.Qc6 or 31.Bc6 wins).  So I guess I proved that I can drop a pawn at blitz speed, but did figure out that 29…Qd8! is the accurate, equal move, and also noticed that I had 29…Be6 at my disposal before I got out of there.  Oddly enough, after 29…Bh3! first, then 30.RxRc8 (or 30.Qc2, and then I can force this sequence by trading rooks on c7) QxRc8 would force the trade off queens, leaving an equal position with only bishops.

My conclusions of this game are that I need to seriously consider my chances for grabbing initiative: 7…b5! and 10…Qe7 come to mind.  Also, I need to improve at pruning out useless variations such as looking at 10…b6.  Clock-management will also be key going forward.  I feel I am playing at a higher level these days than say last year, but it’s slowly starting to come around.  I think the biggest thing that I did last year was to try and improve my blindfold/calculation, but it’s taken a while for that to kick in in terms of fitting it into the rest of my game.  If it helps me most of the time on defense then that is fine, as chess is mostly about defending!  Every move in chess is like a scientific research-paper where you have to defend your hypothesis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Unfathomable Position

I spent 37 minutes on a single position.  No, I wasn’t looking for a move, and no I didn’t think my position was worse, I was simply comparing strategies roughly eight moves deep in a handful of different lines.  I know from experience that if I take a lot of time in a position, objectively the position warrants a deep investigation even if it’s foolhardy to do this OTB.  I had no idea.  I analyzed it again before I plugged in the engine, and this one is like staring into the Milky-Way.  I’ve heard of IMs and GMs talking about a position being like this, but this is the first time that I’ve ever experienced the feeling OTB.

Round 2

14…Ne4!  I didn’t think this was a strong move until he played it.  This is where I spent the 37 minutes.  My initial reaction was the move I played, realizing he doesn’t lose a piece.  It seemed about five minutes into my think I wanted to play 15.Bf3, but thought that without deep analysis it could just be a “coffee-house” move.  Now, I think that unless you are playing postal-chess, any move in this position could seem like a coffee-house move.

Later into my think, I almost played 15.Bh2, reached toward the board a second-time (the first time was for 15.Bf3), but ultimately played the move one would have thought all along, but that’s because I had finally come up with a strategy to make it playable.  I probably looked at close to ten moves/continuations actually, in all.  Trying to look ahead in any of these lines is like staring into the heavens.  Of course, when you replay it, the game continuation looks like a no-brainer, and may have been the best chance for an advantage after all.  After 15.Bf3, 15…Bg5! and 15…NxNc3 are both strong.

20.Rxe6?  20.c5! is winning, though it’s only initially +1.  Here is where the time wasted earlier really cost me.  Now I blundered my b2 pawn, didn’t even see I was dropping it, but 21.c5! is still += for White.

After the game Daniel (Expert), thought that I might be winning with 28.Qf7?? and wanted to know what the computer thought about it, but he is on the right track as 28.Rf7 Rg8 is 0.0 equal.

During the game, I wasn’t worried about him playing RxBg3, as I demonstrated in the post-mortem successfully, but was worried about his a-pawn promoting, which caused me to rashly play 29.Be5?? because I though that if defended passively that he would promote his pawn.  Even 29.Bf4 holds as the importance of the h-pawn is apparently sort of an illusion here.  I missed his mate threat, and resigned before the mating was actually played.

 

 

The English Opening

I’d never played 1.c4 in a rated tournament before.  Well, to be honest, I played it one time the other day, since I was planning on playing it OTB the next day.  I don’t ever remember playing 1.c4 even online before that, so if I have it must be astronomically rare.  I studied absolutely nothing but my one online game before playing this, and the English Opening actually has tons of different lines.  Nevertheless, now I can say I’ve played it!

Round 3

Magnus Carlsen’s Games

One impression I get from Magnus’ games is to adopt a Bobby Fischer saying about Alekhine “If you’ve seen one Magnus Carlsen game, you’ve seen ’em all.”  Another impression I get is Magnus will to win.

Magnus will vary his opening lines greatly, perhaps more than anyone, and yet know the theory or some idea in every unsharp line he plays.  Once Magnus opponent is worn down in some equal to += position, then he still has loads of energy to conjure something up.  Here’s a good example:

Carlsen vs Onishuk 2007

29.b4!  Sacking a pawn is the only way to make progress – getting the king involved is only equal.

32…f5??  Here it is Black’s turn to counter-sac with 32…Re7, giving up two knights for rook, or pinning the knight if 33.NxBb4.